Andavari

Interesting that the Monitoring feature would cause a BSOD, but you are using XP SP2.

v5.16 was released Tuesday, March 22, 2016. They've been reminded! But it's up to them when they offer it.

That too! On my mothers new Dell laptop Dell tech support patched her graphics drivers with a fix to prevent it from constantly crashing.

Frequent BSOD's can be caused by failing hardware! Or some buggy software you're using like an antivirus software, firewall software, web browser, etc, or something that's resident all the time or some of the time. On the hardware side run a memory test with for example Microsoft Windows Memory Diagnostic - it's built into Win7, and perhaps newer versions of Windows - choose the Extended Test option and then let it run at least 1 pass, although multiple passes (2, 3, 7, etc.,) may be required to actually find if it is failing RAM causing the issue. One thing though back in December 2015 when I had failing RAM two separate memory testing programs failed to detect the faulty RAM I had, however Windows itself during startup finally detected it. It could be any hardware component causing it, although the usual culprits in my opinion if it is hardware related are RAM, Hard Disk, Graphics Card, Power Supply. Other hardware that isn't typically prone to failure can be difficult to track down.

Are there any: * Crashdumps in the Recuva folder? * Application errors logs listed in Windows Event Viewer that point to Recuva? If you have any of those it might help figure out the issue.

No it doesn't. However here's how to save the results of what's been deleted (has to be done manually): http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=45898

MVPS.org HOSTS File updated 1 April 2016: http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

Actually it does work on the FAT32 filesystem, even with floppy diskettes. I've used it to successfully recover files from USB thumb drives with FAT32 and floppy disks which I believe are FAT12.

Free and Pro have the same recovery capabilities "Advanced file recovery" according to the comparison shown at the bottom of the main Recuva webpage: https://www.piriform.com/recuva

That's why when I ran the CCleaner registry cleaner on my mother's Win10 Dell laptop I only had it remove references to the McAfee security suite I previously uninstalled in favor of Windows Defender, and since I didn't know about most of the stuff (unique to Win10) that was listed in the registry cleaner I didn't bother letting it delete them.

It only works in Summary View, so if you have CCleaner configured to show in Detailed View you have to click the box after Analyze or Run Cleaner to show the results in Summary View. This is the right-click option, screenshot (click to enlarge):

Too many download sites have that issue for those who don't use an adblocking extension in their browsers, or at the very least a hosts file like MVPS.

I've had that issue using three or four different adblocking extensions in Chrome/Chromium based browsers. I had to exclude this in CCleaner that points to my Chrome/Chromium profile folder: Exclude14=PATH|D:\PortableApps\IronPortable\Profile\Default\Local Extension Settings\|*.*||0|0|24

Who knows what's legit, fraudulent programs can look legit and a screenshot won't reveal too much - think of all those fake AV's with a snazzy GUI to sucker people into using them and end up with multitudes of infection. All I could find about "the program" in the screenshot without opening any actual links since Web of Trust (WOT) had the sites marked as: Scam, Malware, Virus, Potentially Unwanted But who knows who the program is actually by, sort of a generic name. And since this really has nothing to do with CCleaner or CCleaner Cloud per-say I've moved this topic to Windows Security. Edit: I seriously doubt any ISP would recommend installing something like this. It seems like those calls one will get on the phone stating your Windows is infected and you need "this program" to clean it which is a scam. I just tell those people to eat s**t and hangup the phone.

Just by reading the Windows Management Instrumentation ("WMI") description it doesn't look like something that should ever be turned off or messed with due to other stuff failing to function without it. On old XP here it starts automatically.

With Edge cleaning many have issues where it can't be cleaned at certain times - just search the forum to see those.

Well allot of software sends people to a third-party download site, for instance I remember in the past when wanting to download AVG Antivirus Free Edition the download would be from CNET Download.com, although I would never download any antivirus or security software in general from a third-party download site.

That is strange.

On Win10 I noticed soon after startup or restart the Edge cleaning is unavailable in CCleaner. What I did was tick the box in the CCleaner popup telling it to no longer notify me of the inability to clean Edge because sometimes it will clean it with no issue, but when it can't clean it I don't need it warning me.

I wonder if this is a bug or more so a limitation in the Windows Defrag API. I've seen many defrag tools including Windows Defrag (on XP at least when it still had a drive map GUI) seemingly get stuck (not really stuck at all) on a filename of a file which is too small to take so long to move.

This is what the detections are: HKLM\Software\Adobe\Shockwave 11 HKCU\Software\Adobe\Shockwave 11

Also see here: http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=5739

If you want it completely off when using portable you may need to reset the settings in CCleaner Portable ('Options > Advanced > Restore Default Settings), or when CCleaner Portable isn't running delete the ccleaner.ini file. If I'm remember correctly and I don't know if I actually am I think Monitoring could briefly be used in the portable version before they disabled that ability - again I could be remembering this wrong. If I'm correct that may be why it's partially enabled for you and why you can't disable it or change any settings.

Portable version has Monitoring disabled from my knowledge (it's completely disabled on WinXP and Win10 when I checked), i.e.; it's unusable and isn't necessary in a portable environment/scenario where it isn't necessary. To use Monitoring use the install version.

Could be something auto re-registering but that many keys sounds alarming.