lokoike

lololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you Andy, that is the funniest thing I have heard all day! Seriously, would you guys start recording your conversations with MS and emailing them to me so that my morale can go up about a dozen or so points?! And I suppose if you were to find a small bug in OpenOffice, MS would naturally recommend immediately removing it from your system and purchasing a copy of MS Office instead, right?! Oh my goodness, that is too funny! MS kills me, seriously! Just uncheck the 'Hotfix Uninstallers' box; no need to uninstall CCleaner. And in a few days, v1.28 will be out, which will remedy the problem. Of course, I'm sure MS will still consider Disk Cleanup the definitive file removing utility... roflcopter, lollerskates!

Ditto. Manners FTW! Of course, this is coming from lokoike, an unmannered, uncivilized swine of a human being, but still, it's the thought that counts.

Ah ha! So there, Andavari, you'd best share with me, lest you not turn out as lucky as those poor schmucks!

STOP IT!!! I'm the one hijacking this thread, NOT YOU! Now if only I knew anything at all about cars...

If you want to keep Adobe Acrobat Reader as your PDF reader, just uninstall "Adobe Acrobat 4.0". That way, you will still have version 6 w/ all of the updates. You don't need the old version if you already have a newer one. But, if you want a smaller, faster PDF reader, give Foxit Reader 1.3 a try. It is totally free, and is perfectly compatible with PDFs. After about two minutes with it, I uninstalled Adobe Acrobat Reader 7.0.5 and will never install Adobe's Reader ever again! Foxit really is that good! Eldmannen, you should be proud of my "fix" .

O RLY? Apparently you haven't seen my recent upgrade: That, my friend, is performance. Nothing like a 6,000 HP JATO rocket.

HE'S BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good to abuse see you again kk56!

Just do it in small gray text. That makes it okay. After all, me and Rochip do it all the time! Andavari's hair looks like Cheez Whiz, lollerz!

Well, lets hope it doesn't get THAT bad! Inside jokes FTW!

Hehe, no complaints here. I only say it cause I know Eldmannen will take it well. After all, I have a feeling he hasn't hijacked nearly as many topics as I have! And that is a title I will fight over to the death! So don't even try to catch up with me, K, or doom on you!! Sigh... That was beautiful.

Ain't she a beaut? And Mike, I was gonna let you have a ride, but I'm not so sure after that whole brown seat no pants thing...

Heh, true dat! Course then, I might actually catch up to him in posts! Although, I must admit that his suggestions are "fixes" in a round-about way...

LOL, maybe if they're stoned gremlins! After all, it is a drug-sniffing dog, right?

The only time I seem to have that problem is when there are a lot of people on at the same time, but when it happens, it is miserable! Course, I know next to nothing about web programming and such, so I don't know if something like that could cause a bottleneck, or if it is just in my head...

Okay, seriously, can the government come up with a lamer excuse for compromising its citizens security?!! WTF does obtaining RANDOM search queries do to prevent children from accessing pornography? NOT A DAMN THING, that is what! Last time I checked, search engines such as Google don't make you prove your age to them. So even if the government finds out that people were indeed searching for porn, how on Earth will they be able to tell whether it was a kid or not? If it wasn't for the fact that it would be totally futile, I would say that Google should sue the government! After all, the gov tried to force a company to do something that is totally unreasonable/unnecessary, which costs them money and time that they could be devoting to new products. I realize Google ain't hurting for funds, but last time I checked, neither was the US Government! A big huge THANK YOU to Google for not being a bunch of spineless pansies, like some other web-based companies. *cough* Yahoo! *cough*

A big huge thank you for releasing the Hotfix Uninstaller fix promptly! My personal feelings about the toolbar have already been previously posted on numerous occasions, so I'll just wait and see if they had any impact... Regardless, at least it is still good to see that user input still is a major part of CC.

Yeah, but he gets like a million a day, and I don't know of anyone who has ever gotten a response. I know that I never have. Not that this is his fault, but I think you have more of a chance of being heard by making a thread like this than if you PM him.

Sorry to hear that! You must have missed this post made today! http://forum.ccleaner.com/index.php?s=&sho...indpost&p=32986 RegSupreme Pro does prompt you to make backups of what you deleted, so have you tried restoring your backups yet?

Sweet! And here I thought I was the only person on Earth who still liked Tomb Raider!

DO NOT BUY REGSUPREME PRO UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!!! I personally used it for a while on my computer, but I found that it has a nasty habit of periodically removing entries that are necessary to your system! If I hadn't recently made a System Restore point on my system a couple days before my RegSupreme catastrophe, I would have had to wipe out everything and start from scratch! Since it gives you false positives that can seriously tear up Windows, you'll want to leave that one alone.

MrG (the writer of CCleaner) hasn't replied here yet? He must have missed it, cause I'm sure he doesn't mind getting a hand. I know I wouldn't! Maybe he just searches for topics/posts that have his name in them... MrG, Mr.G, Mr. G, Mr G, MRG, mrg, mrG.

I have a feeling that K's and cde's suggestions about running apps are correct. Perhaps you have a browser, such as Firefox, open? You can crank up FF's cache, so if you set it to around 600 MB, perhaps that is your problem. Could also be a combination of multiple apps. Otherwise, it could also be a bug in CC itself. I have seen comments like this from other users in the past, where analyze incorrectly estimates the numbers of files/size of files removed. Even if the problem does end up being a running app, that is still a bug in CC, because it is listing files that it actually won't clean out, unless of course the apps are shut down first. That should be looked into/fixed. One last question: when you went into MSCONFIG, did you disable the startup processes for your running apps, or did you disable the process for CCleaner? Or both?

Oh, I don't know about that! I keep my PC a whole lot less cluttered than I do my house!

That winapp2.ini editing function you suggested would make things quite a bit easier, but I don't know how I feel about having it be a wizard... I reeeeeeeally don't like wizards... I wonder if there is some clever, easy-to-use, non-wizard method of accomplishing the same thing, while at the same time making it easier than manually editing the winapp2.ini file. The only downfall I see to this is that it might substantially bulk up CCleaner (at least I imagine the wizard method would). Since CCleaner's job is data removal and cleaning, having a format tool (for non-OS HDs) would go along with the other tools built-in to CC. Yes, you can already format your disks via Windows, but you can also do everything else that CCleaner does via Windows, such as removing startup processes, uninstalling software, or cleaning out temporary files. But, having all of those tools located together in one small utility just makes it more convenient, since you don't have to use a dozen different apps with a dozen different interfaces to accomplish a few related tasks. I can't speak for everyone else, but I personally would use the format utility if it was integrated into CCleaner.