trium

i have this

why not changed from nightly to aurora? shame on mozilla...

the free version is your second link all 3 on your old firefox shortcut: the first link for free version download dont work in my case but if you scroll down, there is another link to download the free version. this link give you the standard installer version. and if you scroll down to the bottom of the page you can click on builds and with this you are by your second link ps: choose the slim with your second link...

how is it with only kingsoft writer free? 42 MB size http://www.computerbild.de/download/Kingsoft-Writer-Free-2012-7942854.html or http://www.chip.de/downloads/Kingsoft-Writer-Free-2012_52026790.html dont forget MS WORD FREE with advertising on the corner right below but it works only on vista and 7

the most compatible part to microsofts office is word. but for example many text-formattings does not showing the other compatants correctly or very well. (openoffice and libreoffice in my case) and the other office parts (spreadsheet/powerpoint) are more even bad compared to ms office. (if there are created with ms office) so you should decide for an office vendor and then create everything with this program, then there are no problems (compatibility). i have nukecads softmaker too :-) on a cd openoffice was taken by oracle from sun and goes on. but the developers were different opinions. one part works on openoffice and the other on libreoffice. the libreofficeteam has more innovations and compatibility implemented in his office. but not everything for the benefit of the user as i mean (for example the menu bar is now full of unsightly symbols perhaps to be different from openoffice style) i dont know how it is in version 5.x.x, i have yet the version 4.4. with libre and version 4.1.2 with open.

how is it with: Kingsoft writer/spreadsheet free or the complete office personal free? english german and of course not to forget the free word 2010* and excel 2010* from microsoft *works only on vista and 7 as far as i know

i did it one time one version of my antivirus avg free didnt work on my w8.1 in the past. so i was going to the avg-forum and told my issue. I had to download a special remote-software from the site and then I could watch what the employee has done.

v381.65 from 6.april 2017 xp support end from ms was 04.2014 --> nvidia v370 (07.2016) vista support end from ms was 04.2017 -this month! --> nvidia v367 (05.2016) but nvidia means vista support can closed before xp... 3 years after xps end but more as a half year before vista ending i dont know until today that nvidia seems to be a bunch of comedians

ublock v1.12.1 gorhill released this 5 days ago No code change, just a re-package with more recent filter lists to ensure uBlock Origin works out of the box with EasyPrivacy without breaking Facebook upload feature: a filter in EasyPrivacy was causing a false positive. For existing installations, just force an update of EasyPrivacy. I did not look into the details, but at first glance it seems the false positive appeared as a result of Facebook changing its code. It's unlikely sites such as Facebook (who would rather not encourage the use of blockers) would test their pages when using a blocker in order to ensure their site still works fine with a blocker. Today I learned: a whole lot of users have no clue that most blockers work based on filter lists which can cause false positives. The Facebook issue would have happened with any blocker making use of EasyPrivacy. False positives must be reported to filter list maintainers (not here), and often just forcing an update of filter lists may resolve an issue (because maybe somebody else reported the issue and it was fixed by maintainers).

i dont know. i have w8.1 64bit but firefox only with 32bit

and if you want to download the newest version directly from piriform and not from filehippo: 1.) click not on DOWNLOAD! 2.) scroll down this download-side to the bottom 3.) click on builds

interesting: for my installed v52.0.2 on w8.1 64bit it suggests to version v52.0.2esr

ff v53.0 April 19, 2017 NewImproved graphics stability for Windows users with the addition of compositor process separation (Quantum Compositor) Two new 'compact' themes available in Firefox, dark and light, based on the Firefox Developer Edition theme Lightweight themes are now applied in private browsing windows Reader Mode now displays estimated reading time for the page Windows 7+ users on 64-bit OS can select 32-bit or 64-bit versions in the stub installer FixedVarious security fixes ChangedUpdated the design of site permission requests to make them harder to miss and easier to understand Windows XP and Vista are no longer supported. XP and Vista users running Firefox 52 will continue to receive security updates on Firefox ESR 52. 32-bit Mac OS X is no longer supported. 32-bit Mac OS X users can switch to Firefox ESR 52 to continue receiving security updates. Updates for Mac OS X are smaller in size compared to updates for Firefox 52 New visual design for audio and video controls Ended Firefox Linux support for processors older than Pentium 4 and AMD Opteron The last few characters of shortened tab titles fade out instead of being replaced by ellipses to keep more of the title visible DeveloperChanges for web developers Support for WebM video with alpha, which allows playing videos with transparent backgrounds

... after 2 years of retirement for my vista it needs 2 hours (with 100 % cpu utilization) for searching updates >130 with a few updates vista means to me, a restart would be necessary but i dont need a new 2 hours session for the other last 120

ublock v1.12.0 gorhill released this 4 days ago Changes New static network filter option: badfilter. Using this option will prevent another filter to be loaded in memory. See uBlockOrigin/uAssets#192 for rationale for having such a filter option. Chromium/Firefox WebExtension Ability to support more request types from webRequest API: csp-report, font, media, websocket, and actually whatever is part of webRequest.ResourceType. This means uBO will be able to natively filter websocket connection attempts starting with Chromium 58. Firefox The webext version for Firefox has been converted into a hybrid version, to allow seamless migration of uBO's settings/data from a legacy extension to webext extension. I consider this webext version of uBO to be fit to release to AMO if the current stable Firefox version (52) supported all the proper WebExtensions API required by uBO. All the blocking issues have been resolved, but the fixes will be available in a future stable version of Firefox. Update: due to auto-update snafu, the webext version of uBO has been given a different id than the official one, this will guarantee that auto-update won't cause issue (you will have to update manually if using the webext version). Important: If you install the webext version of uBO (you need the most recent build of Nightly), this is what will happen: When you launch uBO/webext for the first time, it will read all your settings/data from the old storage and migrate them to the new webext storage. This happens only if uBO/webext can find a file named ublock0.sqlite. This will happens only once, the first time you install uBO/webext. Depending of how much data there is to migrate, this may cause your browser to work hard during that first launch and delay readiness. Once the data from the uBO/legacy has been migrated to uBO/webext, each version of uBO will only see its own data, meaning no change in settings in one version will be seen by the other version. If you remove uBO/webext, this also removes the storage associated to it, meaning re-installing uBO/webext following removal will cause the storage migration code to kick in again. Closed as fixed: Chromium Use the strictest setting for preventing the leakage of private IP addresses through WebRTC. It turns out the use of the strictest setting has (currently) the unforeseen virtuous side-effect of preventing WebRTC-delivered ads on some sites. See uBlockOrigin/uAssets#333 (comment).EdgeClicking element that doesn't load due to size restriction doesn't workFirefoxuBO broken on Firefox mozilla-central tip (fixed by @gijsk through pull request #2493) jpm sign fails (fixed by @andreicristianpetcu through pull request #2434) Firefox/WebextensionWebextensions under Firefox : No settings save dialog is displayedCoreAutogenerated filter breaks a web page Cosmetic filters containing pseudo-elements like ::before and ::after are ignored Unable to remove/modify dynamic filter when using wildcard Dynamic URL Filtering fails to take precedence over Dynamic Filtering for worker requests Enable users to create their own custom scriptletsSee "Advanced settings"/userResourcesLocation.

ofcourse, another way is to disable the services --> windows update, security center, firewall (if you have another) ect.

but for the other security option like firewall, virusprotection, spywareprotection there are a option to disable the security center warnings. for ex.: i have another software installed and monitoring itself. the status of spyware protection is not monitored by the security center, and you will not receive any warning.

the 1. easy way is as hazelnut used. (deactivate windows update -not the service, one click at the taskbar to close the warning in the taskbar) the 2. easy way is to disable all warnings from vista security center. --> right on the security center --> change the security center notification method --> dont send notification and dont display the icon (not recommended) specially for notifications about windows update, there is no option available in vista.

there is not such a easy way as in xp or 7 to deactivate the warnings from the security center in vista.

look here the full level look here the basic level

thank you for your advices. the next time im there, ill try to figure out what's going on... perhaps one and/or another of your advices will help :-)

im too lazy to start my vista-pc ;-) i mean there is it: System Control -> Control Center -> on the left -> Maintenance Center Settings -> remove the check mark on "Windows Update"

hi, i was recently in a public association. there ran a computer with Windows 7 64 bit on an AMD II X2 240 with 2 GB Ram (in a network). For the display are available an onboard graphic and probably a Geforce 630 (if I have correctly seen, im not sure). Avira Antivirus free is installed. there was still a Kaspersky Anti-Virus installation, at which the usage period has expired. This I have uninstalled. the ram usage is 1,2 GB only with showing desktop. autostart is only grafikdriver, avira... i have looked at the whole only volatile, in any case, the processor is almost in low usage. the startprocedure seems to be fine. the computer responds quite sluggishly or it takes a few seconds or longer for something to be called up. the computer probably comes from the university. I can not imagine that this computer ran with this bad performance so in the university ... my questions: is this normal? is it the 64bit version because it slow down or is it the amount of ram or what else? perhaps wrong driver? has anyone had a clue or already experiences with something like that?

suppl: i dont know if cc use the registry for ff-plugins... open your registry (regedit) go to: --> hkey_local_machine --> software --> mozilla plugins (there will you find the installed plugins and the path) --> delete the entry "mozilla plugins" note: i dont know if other mozilla apps use this entry for the work (thunderbird or what else) .