JDPower Posted April 3, 2007 Share Posted April 3, 2007 Java version 6.1 (1.6.0_1) just released - Java Runtime Environment (JRE) 6.1 (Fourth download in the list) Just a bugfix but near 100 bugs fixed - Changelog Don't know why the main Java site hasn't even got Java version 6 listed when its been on the Sun site for months though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeeCee Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 There's no any security updates. I think i stick with 6.0. Path Copy TeraCopy Unlocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted April 4, 2007 Moderators Share Posted April 4, 2007 There's no any security updates. I think i stick with 6.0. It is v6.0 it's 6.0 with an update, more specifically all these bugs listed here which I think is worth updating as bugs can cause unexpected behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwillener Posted April 6, 2007 Share Posted April 6, 2007 Don't forget to uninstall any previous versions; the JRE installer still doesn't uninstall earlier versions. It should at least give an option to automatically uninstall older versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted April 6, 2007 Moderators Share Posted April 6, 2007 Don't forget to uninstall any previous versions; the JRE installer still doesn't uninstall earlier versions. It should at least give an option to automatically uninstall older versions. Which is the reason why more software titles need to utilize one directory without version numbering them, etc., and they just need to do what Microsoft does and have hotfixes without having to remove a previous version at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwillener Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 There seems to have been a reason for this in the past; some applications needed very specific JRE versions, otherwise they wouldn't run correctly. (I have one app that needs JRE 1.3.7!) However, generally (since 1.5) there is no longer a need to keep multiple versions, so at least they could offer the automatic removal of older versions when a new JRE is installed. On the other hand, Microsoft has started a similar confusing game with .NET Framework. I am still not sure what versions I actually need to keep, and which are obsolete - 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0...? Up to 2.0 you needed all previous versions, but I am unsure about 3.0 - I seem to be unable to find any definite answers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted April 7, 2007 Moderators Share Posted April 7, 2007 I have some applications that require .NET Framework v1.0 to work and removing v1.0 breaks those applications. I've installed 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. The only reason I even installed 3.0 was because an up and coming Paint.NET version is going to require it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators rridgely Posted April 7, 2007 Moderators Share Posted April 7, 2007 I really like the latest version of paint.net. Its one of the few programs that seems to actually keep getting better with each update. All I want is a magnetic lasso to easily cut stuff out, once it has that it will do everything I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now