Moderators hazelnut Posted December 13, 2011 Moderators Share Posted December 13, 2011 Seems like Firefox is now too big for 32bit systems. http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Firefox-is-bursting-at-the-seams-1393772.html Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eL_PuSHeR Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 It's a somewhat known fact that OS developers are forcing users to switch to x64 systems, even if x86 could still manage more than 4 GB of RAM if desired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTD121 Posted December 14, 2011 Share Posted December 14, 2011 That article/blurb is pretty light on details of the problem, and possible solution, if any was reached. Also, why can't they optimize some more after the initial build? Are they still using the same optimizations from the first comiles from 4 years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tr3bg0D Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 They need to quuit following in the footsteps of Mickey$oft. Just because HDD are bigger and systems are faster, that doesn't mean you should start getting sloppy with code. I have some older Dells that no longer can bowse the net since the browser sucks up all the memory the system has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted December 19, 2011 Moderators Share Posted December 19, 2011 I can't stand the amount of RAM Firefox uses, it's ridiculous. But on the other hand I like the browser over all others I've tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eL_PuSHeR Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 I was an Opera user a long time until I grew tired of not being compatible with a few pages which the programmers didn't seem to care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Fast Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 And, the solution is to just compile for 32 bit under 64 bit Windows. The extra ram is there, & this solves the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now