Winapp2.ini Posted May 7, 2011 Share Posted May 7, 2011 I decided to test out some firefox speeds using the sunspider tests. I got some interesting results! Nightly (6.0 alpha) ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1335.8ms +/- 0.2% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 188.1ms +/- 0.8% cube: 70.5ms +/- 2.7% morph: 55.6ms +/- 1.1% raytrace: 62.0ms +/- 1.1% access: 327.7ms +/- 0.7% binary-trees: 25.1ms +/- 0.9% fannkuch: 185.7ms +/- 0.5% nbody: 67.9ms +/- 2.3% nsieve: 49.0ms +/- 1.0% bitops: 257.9ms +/- 0.3% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 43.4ms +/- 0.9% bits-in-byte: 81.2ms +/- 0.6% bitwise-and: 49.3ms +/- 0.7% nsieve-bits: 84.0ms +/- 0.9% controlflow: 31.0ms +/- 1.5% recursive: 31.0ms +/- 1.5% crypto: 116.1ms +/- 0.2% aes: 48.1ms +/- 0.5% md5: 32.0ms +/- 0.0% sha1: 36.0ms +/- 0.0% date: 61.7ms +/- 1.3% format-tofte: 35.8ms +/- 0.8% format-xparb: 25.9ms +/- 2.4% math: 191.1ms +/- 1.0% cordic: 99.7ms +/- 1.5% partial-sums: 51.3ms +/- 0.9% spectral-norm: 40.1ms +/- 1.8% regexp: 11.9ms +/- 4.4% dna: 11.9ms +/- 4.4% string: 150.3ms +/- 1.8% base64: 29.6ms +/- 1.2% fasta: 47.3ms +/- 0.7% tagcloud: 27.1ms +/- 1.5% unpack-code: 21.3ms +/- 1.6% validate-input: 25.0ms +/- 10.0% Aurora (5.0 Alpha) ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1593.0ms +/- 0.3% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 242.7ms +/- 0.8% cube: 88.5ms +/- 1.2% morph: 75.0ms +/- 1.7% raytrace: 79.2ms +/- 0.4% access: 393.1ms +/- 0.9% binary-trees: 29.2ms +/- 1.0% fannkuch: 211.2ms +/- 0.3% nbody: 99.3ms +/- 3.8% nsieve: 53.4ms +/- 0.7% bitops: 300.7ms +/- 0.5% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 58.6ms +/- 0.9% bits-in-byte: 83.9ms +/- 0.7% bitwise-and: 62.0ms +/- 0.5% nsieve-bits: 96.2ms +/- 0.5% controlflow: 38.9ms +/- 1.4% recursive: 38.9ms +/- 1.4% crypto: 135.8ms +/- 0.5% aes: 53.5ms +/- 0.7% md5: 39.5ms +/- 1.0% sha1: 42.8ms +/- 0.7% date: 68.0ms +/- 1.1% format-tofte: 40.3ms +/- 0.9% format-xparb: 27.7ms +/- 2.1% math: 237.1ms +/- 1.0% cordic: 117.1ms +/- 0.5% partial-sums: 66.0ms +/- 2.9% spectral-norm: 54.0ms +/- 0.0% regexp: 11.8ms +/- 3.8% dna: 11.8ms +/- 3.8% string: 164.9ms +/- 0.7% base64: 33.9ms +/- 1.6% fasta: 53.4ms +/- 0.7% tagcloud: 28.9ms +/- 1.4% unpack-code: 22.4ms +/- 1.6% validate-input: 26.3ms +/- 4.4% PaleMoon (4.0.5 x64) ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1598.9ms +/- 0.3% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 231.2ms +/- 1.0% cube: 86.4ms +/- 2.2% morph: 69.4ms +/- 1.4% raytrace: 75.4ms +/- 0.7% access: 371.9ms +/- 0.5% binary-trees: 35.6ms +/- 1.7% fannkuch: 203.6ms +/- 0.7% nbody: 78.4ms +/- 1.9% nsieve: 54.3ms +/- 1.2% bitops: 301.5ms +/- 0.6% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 56.5ms +/- 1.1% bits-in-byte: 85.7ms +/- 1.8% bitwise-and: 59.9ms +/- 1.3% nsieve-bits: 99.4ms +/- 1.1% controlflow: 39.9ms +/- 1.6% recursive: 39.9ms +/- 1.6% crypto: 138.8ms +/- 0.5% aes: 55.6ms +/- 0.7% md5: 40.4ms +/- 0.9% sha1: 42.8ms +/- 0.7% date: 82.9ms +/- 0.9% format-tofte: 50.9ms +/- 1.7% format-xparb: 32.0ms +/- 1.8% math: 221.3ms +/- 0.7% cordic: 113.8ms +/- 0.6% partial-sums: 58.1ms +/- 2.3% spectral-norm: 49.4ms +/- 1.8% regexp: 12.0ms +/- 4.0% dna: 12.0ms +/- 4.0% string: 199.4ms +/- 1.1% base64: 34.1ms +/- 1.5% fasta: 64.0ms +/- 1.7% tagcloud: 38.1ms +/- 1.4% unpack-code: 32.3ms +/- 1.1% validate-input: 30.9ms +/- 8.0% I know browser benchmarks need to be taken with a grain of salt, but it's interesting to see that 6.0 seems to out preform Palemoon, which is optimized for speed. System specs, since it's probably relevant: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14823386/2011-05-06_221026.png winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redhawk Posted May 7, 2011 Share Posted May 7, 2011 but they'll all fall over when you start using Adobe Flash Richard S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethec Posted May 10, 2011 Share Posted May 10, 2011 Out of curiosity, how does it compare witt other browsers (since you're using Win7, I assume you've got IE9 installed) ? Piriform French translator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now