Tarun Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 intels suck! LIKE YO MOTHA Actually it's opinions like those that suck. A processor is a processor. There's not really any difference in them except for personal taste. Both Intel and AMD have equally good and bad points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldmannen Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 Are you serious?! That isn't your primary computer, is it? I mean, I can believe that Linux handles resources better than Windows, but I didn't think it was that much better! Heh, well that was my first computer. Now I dont have that one. I have a AMD Athlon Thunderbird 900 MHz (Socket A), with 256 mb RAM, 80 gb hdd, GeForce4 Ti4200, SB Live! Value, 3Com 3c905b. But I think Linux could work on a 386SX at 16 MHz with 8 mb RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobrakommander56 Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 anyone see the benchmarks on the new x1900's they are killer. Insert random C4 joke here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lokoike Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 anyone see the benchmarks on the new x1900's they are killer. What's that?! Did I just hear kk56 compliment ATI?!! Yeah, I wouldn't mind testing one of those out myself. Bet it would still get an awful score on 3DMark 2006. Save a tree, eat a beaver. Save a tree, wipe with an owl. Every time a bell rings, a thread gets hijacked! ding, ding! Give Andavari lots of money and maybe even consider getting K a DVD-RW drive. If it's not Scottish, IT'S CRAP!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccleaner professional user Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 CPU (400 of them) 5,000 mhz X 400 (2,000,000,000 mhz) Motherboard - Intel based Audio - Creative Labs Hyperion / 496 bit audio sampling / 1,024 midi instrument voices / + or - 0.01 clock error Video - ATI / 32 X AGP ATI Radeon Extreme 300 gig 2,000 mhz mem (1,024 bit color) USB - 4.0 / 300 X usb 1.0 speeds Speakers - Cerwin Vega Earthquake Series / 200,000 watt sub series w/remote / 100 in sub LAN - 600 terabytes sec / optical Ram - 500 X 1,024 mb sticks (500,000 mb) Hard Disk - Seagate 30,000 rpm 2,000 terabyte w/100 gig cache. Less than 0.00000000000005 seek time. Output total - 300,000 terabytes / sec Monitor - NEC flat panel crt / 10 billion scans sec / 16 mi wide by 12 mi high resolution / 800 billion colors I know this is slow... maybe someone can beat it easily with a cheap system from tiger direct. I don't know. Let me know if this sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now