slowday444 Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 I'm afraid that my dear wife may not know the difference between a fish and a phish. I have the anti-phishing capabilities of both IE (which she never uses) and Firefox enabled, however, I'm considering installing Comodo's or McKafee's site advisors and using one of them instead since they can graphically inform. This way, I could tell her to make sure "this" is green or whatever. Do you use either of these now and what is your opinion? If a site was fake, I'm sure Firefox's advisor would give a pretty graphic warning but is it as dependable as Comodo or McKafee? Thank You! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 McAfee Site Advisor is quite useful, dunno about Comodo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators rridgely Posted July 24, 2007 Moderators Share Posted July 24, 2007 I would use site advisor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fireryone Posted July 25, 2007 Share Posted July 25, 2007 Haven't used comodo, but I feel uncomfortable using a browser without site advisor. fireryone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now