nod32
-
Posts
125 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by nod32
-
-
ehem.... NOD32
The interface isn't all that great, but I love it. Low on system resources too. But you do have to pay for it. Did you say you were looking for a free av?
-
I've tried a few p2p programs, including sharaza and WinMX, but I like limewire the best. I get the best results wiith it and it works great.
When you said you got 4 trojans, was that from installing Limewire or downloading a file from it? Just curious becuase Limewire has only shown positives results for me.
-
Do you have FF set to delete cookies on shutdown (of program)?
-
duh, you've never heard of Scam Free Zone?
</sarcasm>
It says on that sight that they certified them.
edit
Page looks great on firefox
-
Oh god... It's coming this way
-
Yeah, yeah.
Windows works fine for me, so theirs no point in switching.(Lets not start a war here)
And anyway I'm just a teenager, I dont have enough money to buy a Mac
I think most people (including me) go for windows becuase its the most user friendly.
BTW, I dont think Windows is the best at everything.
-
Kill the bot
-
Is the 1.1 beta reasonably stable?
-
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is A4FB-A1F8
Directory of C:\WINDOWS\downlo~1
31/03/2005 04:27 PM <DIR> .
31/03/2005 04:27 PM <DIR> ..
31/03/2005 04:27 PM 65 desktop.ini
1 File(s) 65 bytes
2 Dir(s) 24,414,457,856 bytes free
-
NOD32 is tackling spyware with 2.5
Im in love
-
I've already checked there a few times. Only 2 files. Both are Java Runtime Enviorments. Their the same version, created at the same time, and niether are damaged.
I tried deleting them, but it said there wasn't enough information and they just dissapered.
Problem still present
-
The world's most popular internet cleaning tool to wipe and cleanup traces of internet history fast use internet cleaning tool
CCleaner wannabee
-
Winrar for me. Mainly beacuse it supports many formats.
-
I removed the IE Restrictions. The other stuff doesn't bug me.
No improvment
-
Logfile of HijackThis v1.99.1
Scan saved at 5:39:41 PM, on 06/05/2005
Platform: Windows XP SP2 (WinNT 5.01.2600)
MSIE: Internet Explorer v6.00 SP2 (6.00.2900.2180)
Running processes:
C:\WINDOWS\System32\smss.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\winlogon.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\services.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\lsass.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\svchost.exe
C:\WINDOWS\System32\svchost.exe
C:\Program Files\Sygate\smc.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\spoolsv.exe
C:\Program Files\Eset\nod32krn.exe
C:\WINDOWS\Explorer.EXE
C:\Program Files\Eset\nod32kui.exe
C:\Program Files\Winamp\Winamp.exe
C:\Program Files\MSN Messenger\msnmsgr.exe
C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe
C:\Documents and Settings\Mattt\Desktop\HijackThis.exe
R0 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Start Page = http://www.google.ca/
O2 - BHO: AcroIEHlprObj Class - {06849E9F-C8D7-4D59-B87D-784B7D6BE0B3} - C:\Program Files\Adobe\ActiveX\AcroIEHelper.dll
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [nod32kui] "C:\Program Files\Eset\nod32kui.exe" /WAITSERVICE
O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [smcService] C:\PROGRA~1\Sygate\smc.exe -startgui
O6 - HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Restrictions present
O9 - Extra button: (no name) - {08B0E5C0-4FCB-11CF-AAA5-00401C608501} - C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_03\bin\npjpi150_03.dll
O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: Sun Java Console - {08B0E5C0-4FCB-11CF-AAA5-00401C608501} - C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_03\bin\npjpi150_03.dll
O9 - Extra button: Messenger - {FB5F1910-F110-11d2-BB9E-00C04F795683} - C:\Program Files\Messenger\msmsgs.exe
O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: Windows Messenger - {FB5F1910-F110-11d2-BB9E-00C04F795683} - C:\Program Files\Messenger\msmsgs.exe
O23 - Service: NOD32 Kernel Service (NOD32krn) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files\Eset\nod32krn.exe
O23 - Service: Sygate Personal Firewall (SmcService) - Sygate Technologies, Inc. - C:\Program Files\Sygate\smc.exe
Winamp installed fine.
-
... it is just using too much resources... a bit expensive for a stand alone antivirus... and doesnt uninstall completely...
My point exactly...
you cannot say internet explorer is really that horrible... many other programs will need to depend on it to run...I should have said that differently. IE is unsafe, because it's such a essential part of Windows. If everything in windows didn't depend on IE, than it wouldn't be that bad.
-
Sorry MrG,
I can't seem to re-create the problem. It always used to happen. Its like it fixed itself.
-
Because their the most popular, and has been for a while. Even though its so bad. It's like IE. Many people haven't even heard of Firefox, or any alternate browser. They think what they have is the best becuase everyone else uses it.
If they saw how horible Norton or IE really is, then they would switch.
-
If U Try Everything But Still Can't Work...Best Option Don't Use IE And Use Other Browser Like Opera Or Firefox...
I use Firefox, but I need IE for other things...
Are you able to download from Windows Updates?Do you encounter any *.inf file errors when installing applications? (Try and install Winamp 5.09 if you use it, this one used to show a common *.inf error when I had a similar problem.)
Man they sure gave you the runaround on that CastleCops site too. o.o
Yes, Windows Update is working. It wasn't when i first started expiriencing the active x problem.
I was just about to update Winamp
-
Tried the 3 reg files and
cmd /c attrib -r -h +s -a "%systemroot%\Downloaded Program Files"
I got a 404 error when I clicked on the link for 4.reg
Stupid IE.
-
Fast Computer Fast Connection
user_pref("content.interrupt.parsing", true);
user_pref("content.max.tokenizing.time", 2250000);
user_pref("content.notify.interval", 750000);
user_pref("content.notify.ontimer", true);
user_pref("content.switch.threshold", 750000);
user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 0);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 48);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 16);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy", 16);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", 8);
user_pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 65536);
A couple settings of note - Firefox is allocated 4096 KB of memory by default and in this configuration we give it roughly 65MB as denoted by the last line. This can be changed according to what is used.
Fast Computer, Slower Connection
This configuration is more suited to people without ultra fast connections. We are not talking about dial up connections but slower DSL / Cable connections.
user_pref("content.max.tokenizing.time", 2250000);
user_pref("content.notify.interval", 750000);
user_pref("content.notify.ontimer", true);
user_pref("content.switch.threshold", 750000);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 48);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 16);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy", 16);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", 8);
user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 0);
user_pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 65536);
I think you'd be somewhere in between these two. Your computer is definatly fast enough, but your connection isn't "ultra fast".
Play around with the settings a bit.
-
You can try Syagte. Its pretty low on system resources and its one of the best. But if you use Firefox and don't go on any questionable sites, then it wouldn't be too bad.
I dont understand people that have more than one firewall or av running. Theres a point were security turns into paranoia.
-
I've tried it before. Does the basic network.http. stuff in about:conifg. Its not very effective either. Tweaking in FF is best done manually.
-
Already tried re-installing.
Down-grading of OS
in Software
Posted
One of my pc's is much slower and handles XP Pro fine.
Pentium 3 700MHz
256MB of ram
30 GB harddrive
I just can't play very much games on it, and I dont bloat it with software.