RobertoLito Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 (edited) Is there any big difference, in speed mainly, between connecting the hard drive to be recovered to a USB on computer and to the SATA on the drive or connecting it directly to the SATA on the motherboard? Will Recuva (or any other Recovery software) work faster if connected directly to the SATA motherboard? Edited January 16 by RobertoLito Needed to clarify Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators nukecad Posted January 16 Moderators Share Posted January 16 A direct SATA connection has a faster transfer rate than USB. But once the data is transferred any app will still take the same time to work on/with it. So while direct SATA will be quicker writing to the target drive you may not notice much difference overall. *** Out of Beer Error ->->-> Recovering Memory *** Worried about 'Tracking Files'? Worried about why some files come back after cleaning? See this link:https://community.ccleaner.com/topic/52668-tracking-files/?tab=comments#comment-300043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now