computerguy7 Posted November 17, 2009 Share Posted November 17, 2009 Defraggler is awesome! My Suggestions are as follows: - A completion report showing statistics (GB defragged, total duration of defrag, GB/min processed, etc...) - The legend should always be visible. - An ETA of defragging the drive after running analyze. - The ability to schedule Defraggler to run against certain folders / files only. (You can do this manually, but not with a scheduled task) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike42 Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 - A completion report showing statistics (GB defragged, total duration of defrag, GB/min processed, etc...) Absolutely! Maybe it doesn't need to be a page long, but some notification would be nice. Some people don't want such a thing because of defraggler running scheduled tasks in background. So probably the reporting should be optional. - The legend should always be visible. Maybe this too should be configurable. After a while you certainly know, what the colors mean. And then the legend occupies precious screen space. - An ETA of defragging the drive after running analyze. ETA - what? - The ability to schedule Defraggler to run against certain folders / files only. (You can do this manually, but not with a scheduled task) Probably quite useful for certain users. Generally the scheduled tasks should be fully configurable. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted November 30, 2009 Moderators Share Posted November 30, 2009 ETA = Estimated Time of Arrival in other words, how long is it going to take or ETC Estimated Time of Completion Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike42 Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 ETA = Estimated Time of Arrivalin other words, how long is it going to take or ETC Estimated Time of Completion Ah, thanks hazelnut! That would be a VERY nice feature. However, unfeasible to implement, I would say. It would require Defraggler to simmulate the whole defrag run in advance, because there is no direct/linear relation between the remaining data and the time to completion. In fact, it appears to me, that with the current algorithm defraggler ends up with only the smallest files of the drive at the end of defragging and thus the process slows down dramatically in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now