Tarun
-
Posts
2,122 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Tarun
-
-
-
It's a false positive. I wouldn't worry about it.
-
Confirmed.
Status:
POSSIBLY INFECTED/MALWARE (Note: this file has been scanned before. Therefore, this file's scan results will not be stored in the database) (Note: this file was only classified as malware by scanners known to generate more false positives than the average scanner. Do not consider these results definately accurate. Also, because of this, results of this scan will not be recorded in the database.)
MD5 3cface7756cdaf5a2fb4a0de67485b0b
Packers detected:
-
Scanner results
AntiVir
Found nothing
ArcaVir
Found nothing
Avast
Found nothing
AVG Antivirus
Found nothing
BitDefender
Found nothing
ClamAV
Found nothing
Dr.Web
Found nothing
F-Prot Antivirus
Found nothing
Fortinet
Found Prockill.DF-tr
Kaspersky Anti-Virus
Found nothing
NOD32
Found nothing
Norman Virus Control
Found nothing
UNA
Found nothing
VBA32
Found nothing
-
I think you have to donate $20 for this.
-
-
-
Installed by AOL (usually) and is know spyware.
-
-
It could be under options, there's bound to be a type of treeviewlist or something that will show drive letters and let you select which drives you can run the cleaner on.
-
Give it some time to run, I've seen it take over 5 minutes to clean everything.
-
Use Daemon Tools or Alcohol 120% and make a virtual drive. You then mount the images one at a time onto the drive.
-
Congrats, much deserved!
-
What does the mobo support? SATA, IDE, E-IDE, or?
-
Try DjLizard's Dial-a-fix and check everything.
-
I disabled some on my machine that I never really use at all.
Security Center
Indexing Service
SSDP Discovery Service
System Restore (I turned this off back in what.. February.)
Telnet
Universal Plug & Plug (SSDP and UPNP are needed for some sharing applications, MSN, Trillian and other applications like that)
-
Did you notice in CCleaner that it says the file is "Marked for deletion"? That means when you reboot the file gets deleted, and Windows then recreates it at default size.
-
This was a key part, which I found interesting. I bolded some of the interesting lines also.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've had prior experience with some of Arovax's programs like Arovax shield, and while they have been under suspicion for the lack of details they harbor about their products and the company itself; I'm almost positive that they are clean, and on the good side of the force.
But i'll say this, the company behind these products are marketing at some of the slowest computer users in America. Preferably old grannys and retards. There's never more than a few buttons on a screen, and they're simple and to the point. In a way, that clean GUI makes life easier. Yet Arovax shield tended to dumb me down everytime I looked at the interface.
Updated: (downgraded a point) - The scan generated a number of false positives like my VNC client, Pal-Talk, and other random things that may be a security issue, but are programs that are useful. The fast system scan and the full system scan seem to do the same thing...I noticed no difference, almost like both buttons are just there for the hell of it. The settings consist of what drives you scan and that's it. Needs a lot of work.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard about a ton of false positive problems, thus I've not installed/tested this on my machine yet.
-
Seems Arovax has been a flop on BetaNews.
http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Arova...re/1131136869/1
-
Unlocker may be able to help you out.
-
Any word on this?
-
Shareaza
-
Several weeks (months?) ago, some one complained about the exit button and thought it was redundant. They wanted it removed.
Go figure!
David
P.S. I like CCleaner performance and will take it any which way.
That was me who suggested it be removed since it was right there beside the X.
-
Limewire has a lot of spyware.
-
Is it shell32.dll or shell32dll?
Spyware Blaster blocks cookies and ActiveX, CWShredder looks for the CWS Variants, CCleaner wouldn't touch it. ewido has a chance of detecting if it's a virus or trojan.
The problem here is what we know about it is little to nothing. shell32.dll is a legit Microsoft file. Mine is located in the system32 directory. However my dllcache directory doesn't have that file.
Often viruses will mask themselves as a legit file. In this case it could be that shell32dll (not shell32.dll) may be a virus. That's why I recommended scanning it with eTrust.
Is this okay?
in Hardware
Posted
Link 1
Link 2
Vista is nowhere near being released, so don't worry about it.