Jump to content

Move to end of drive? Not really!?


totalz

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
I dont see a reason why large files should be moved to the end. For large files the bandwith of the harddisk is more important and this is better at the beginning. For small files only latency matters and so the position is not important.

 

You're logic sounds correct but I'd like to offer this. And I read this from a post here on the forums. What if you don't use those bigger files very much? Well now you are taking away space for the smaller, more frequently used documents to be placed near the beginning of the hard drive. I guess both points are valid, just depends on your use of those larger files.

There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

 

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal

At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10

Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal

 

link1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I intend to use this so game data files don't have to all be rearranged every defrag (moving several 2GB files consumes about 90% of my defrag time)

my drive is partitioned so the game files are only at the end of the partition and not much slower that it matters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.