Tom AZ Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 I just ran a disk fragmentation analysis with the most current version of Defraggler and it showed 11% fragmentation. I immediately then ran an analysis with the most current version of Auslogics Disk Defrag and it showed 5% fragmentation. Why the big discrepancy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Defraggle Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Very possibly the Defraggler % includes System Volume Info, that best measure of fragmentation % is not as obvious as it first apperas, the Windows Defrag shows much lower than Defraggler to, suggestion on this is here Less Strict Fragment Defintion, Display & Reporting End users are confused by high fragmentation % and many red blocks 3rd party Defraggers have an incentive to be pessimistic, to appear more beneficial (compare with noisy personal firewalls in security field). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now