miguel3 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 good day, am using Ccleaner 2.17.853 on a desk acer 1610 model. windows vista 32, home basic. everything seems to work correctly except that, the number of MB actually erased during cleaning, does not match the number of MB estimated ''to be erased''. normally, that number is much higher. would anyone comment on that ?. thanks/regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmillerusaf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Let me try to understand what you are saying... The number of MB to be cleaned (Analyzing) is usually much higher than the number of MB actually cleaned (Cleaning)? If that's the case, do you usually run CCleaner with internet browsers still open? Did you happen to run it this particular time with everything closed except CCleaner? That would probably make a difference! Keith There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception. Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10 Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguel3 Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 thanks. it is exactly the opposite. the number of MB to be cleaned (Analysing), is much smaller than the number of MB actually cleaned (Cleaning). I always use Ccleaner with everything else (including internet explorer) closed. rgds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmillerusaf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 That's odd. Are you checking any boxes after you analyze? I wonder if "Custom Files and Folders" option is included in the analyzed space... I would think it is. There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception. Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10 Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miguel3 Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 Hi, Keith, again, your diagnosis dead correct. Just unchecked ''Index data files'' box and abnormality has disappeared, sofar. thanks once more/best regards Miguel Nieto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmillerusaf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Glad to hear that! Have a good one!! Keith There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception. Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10 Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now