-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by nolme
-
-
I like your idea, but how would it be possible to clean password protected user accounts?
LOL.
A password protected account it not enough to disable access to its personal folder. ;p
If current user has admin rights, it can access to every folder by default.
Who has specified Private Datas for each account (since Windows XP) ?
A Service has all rights too to access everywhere on the hard drive so it's not a problem.
^^
-
Consensus says that this is not a viable thing (to clean all users). also running as a service would cause CCleaner to clean "system user"
=> You can retrieve all local users using netapi32.dll with functions like NetUserEnum() in C++
=> Then browse all folders ?:\document and settings\<user>
So why is this not viable ?
-
Hi,
the question has already been posted inside the forum maybe not in suggestions.
Running CCleaner as a service could be useful to clean all users datas instead doing this session by session.
Thanks,
Vincent
-
I think we've the same problem.
Here's an explanation.
Computer A:
username: Paul
password: luaP
Computer B:
username: John
password: nhoJ
Both computer have a software deployment tool (OCS, DesktopCentral...)
Using the network agent of these tools will grant SYSTEM credentials
so %TEMP% will NOT be:
c:\Document and Settings\John\Local Settings\Temp
but
%WINDIR%\Temp
We can create a local admin account on each computer but it's TEMP directory will not be the real user one.
So, a parameter is missing for cleaning TEMP, Browser cache... for ALL COMPUTER USERS.
++
Vincent
Clean for all accounts on local computer
in CCleaner Suggestions
Posted
I agree with 'Mr Don'.
BTW, as all MSP, we're making choices for maintenance reasons so this case :
"My dad ran ccleaner on our computer and deleted a bunch of stuff I still needed"
won't arrive because 99.9% of managed computers are single user (but each user as its own login/password).
The only way to clean all in one click is to use network agents which run as SYSTEM.
It has been discussed hundred of times but maybe with wrong arguments ;p