Jump to content

marmite

Experienced Members
  • Posts

    867
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by marmite

  1. Well there are many programs that spew out log files, some of which the user is unaware of. You could review your CCleaner configuration to make sure you haven't missed an application or a setting. What about the applications that you explicitly don't clean in CCleaner - is there anything there that's generating a lot of log files? Not all applications are listed in CCleaner either ... maybe look at what you use regularly and see if there's anything you've overlooked there.

     

    Also, is there anything in the Windows Application or System Event Logs that might suggest a misbehaving application that's maybe throwing out more error logs than usual?

     

    Your system drive will almost always use more space as time goes on, new apps, updates, log files. I guess it's just trying to determine whether your increase is abnormal or not.

     

    You may also want to consider repartitioning at some point to increase the size of your system partition.

  2. No offense to you marmite - but WinDirStat is much more useful in my opinion. It shows a graphical representation for every single file on the harddrive, making them as big as they are in comparison to another file.

    None taken. Diversity of opinion and the debate that it generates are things I value about this place ;)

     

    Funnily enough, I had a need for this type of utility yesterday. I tried WinDirStat first but actually found JDiskReport to be more useful. The problem with WinDirStat's display was just information overload. JDiskReport gave me a cleaner view and I could drill down through the folder structure more efficiently.

     

    Thinking about it (but not too deeply!!) WinDirStat may be better when searching purely by file (size), but JDiskReport may be better when searching by folder structure. The tabs on JDiskReport give really useful overview stuff ... like details of files/sizes by modification date, top 50 by size in the current directory. And all of this changes dynamically as you drill down. And it's really fast.

     

    Just another horses for courses thing I guess :) In the end I left both installed because they each have their strong points.

  3. I would like to see a feature to be able to right click on any file or folder, on any drive and have ccleaner clean it up with the default settings.

    CCleaner tidies specific content within specific Windows and applications folders. If you did a context menu cclean on the average folder on your machine ... I'm wondering what content you would envisage being deleted.

     

    Are you thinking of an 'empty/wipe the entire contents of the current folder' type setting?

  4. Yep sounds like you're doing okay :)

     

    These days most people shouldn't have any trouble getting port stealthing sorted because it generally comes out-of-the-box, either in your software firewall or your router or both. If, like you, you take a healthy interest in security matters then you do get find out what you need just from reading around and from forums like these. The only problem, as with anything on the net, is sorting out the wheat from the chaff.

     

    Because software security is generally getting much better I think far more people are likely to fall for a phishing scam or click on a dodgy software link ... things where it's the user's own action that gets them into trouble. So as you also mentioned, it's very much a case of just applying common sense when you're online.

     

    Happy surfing ;)

  5. If you're running a machine with fully patched software (Windows, browser, browser plug-ins like Flash and PDF reader) and appropriate security (firewall and antivirus) then there's no reason to be particularly concerned about running JavaScript from a security point of view.

     

    I think zealous concerns about JavaScript are largely an unfortunate hang-over from the bad old days of early IE versions which had many JS flaws that weren't discovered or patched quickly enough.

     

    Some turn off JavaScript from an annoyance point of view (pop-ups etc) but with the right set of software on your machine then these days there's really no reason from a security point of view to be running with JavaScript off.

     

    JavaScript generally allows sites to offer a richer, easier user experience. Given the current trends in malware, I would have though that statistically you are much more likely to fall foul of some other issue ... and hopefully that hasn't happened to you either :)

  6. I didn't try that, but tried some of the other Yauba sites, Australia, England. Just can't open them.

    They all resolve to the same IP (in California). So a downed piece of kit is looking likely, unless it's been taken down for some reason of course.

  7. I will upload the .exe file for you in a .zip folder.

    Hi Derik

     

    If you're recommending freeware, there's no problem posting a link to the software here. I know you were being helpful but it's not a good idea to upload an 'unknown' exe file because 1) people cannot vouch for its provenance 2) there may be licensing issues for you or for Piriform :)

     

    I see that your exe matches this one here: http://bigbangenterprises.de/en/doublekiller/ at version 1.6.2.82. Nice little application ... portable too :)

  8. [Excuse the thread tangent drwho; I hope your original question has been pretty-much answered]

     

    Talking of Notepad++, I'm a TextPad man myself ... can anyone with experience of both offer a comparison between the two?

  9. I like fireyone's idea of just overwriting with a blank template after a cclean. Easy enough to just give the script a shortcut so you can run it from an icon or menu.

     

    What I would like to see in CCleaner is a "script/process to be run before/after CCleaner executes" entry, so that people can run tailored jobs before or after CCleaner has executed. There are so many disparate requirements* that it's impossible to build everything into CCleaner ... and indeed things that people would logically want to incorporate at the end of a CCleaner run on their own machine wouldn't fit logically into the mainstream product anyway.

     

    *For example, actually editing (cleaning) the content of files natively within CCleaner is a huge task ... people could have vastly differing requirements for different types of files and file content ... and anything but a very basic generic syntax (e.g. to use in a custom .ini file) would be a big ask.

  10. JScript = Javascript. That's only a different name - I find it better because it avoids confusion with Java.

    JScript, as has been mentioned, is Microsoft's implementation of JavaScript, which is now maintained by Sun. Though functionally very similar they are distinctly different products.

  11. I have now excluded AVG from the list of applications to be cleaned because I want to keep the logs.

    Simply, as ident says, that is your choice. Amongst other things CCleaner deletes logs and temporary files created by various applications. For AVG the logs are the things that CCleaner removes, so you can check the box to delete these logs, or uncheck the box to leave them alone.

  12. If you create another admin user and log on as that user (never been able to get explorer to work properly with 'run as') then you should be able to properly see the temp internet files folder structure for the original user. That might help in identifying the errant files and their true location ... which in turn might give you a bit more of a clue.

  13. With my ISP's DSL modem I have to disable inbound ICMP to be considered full stealth.

    I have to do the same with my software firewall, depending on my connection method ...

     

    I use Windows Firewall though since I don't see any point in using any third party firewalls anymore, especially since a misunderstanding and misconfiguration of them is often more harmful than anything.

    Since I'm running XP I run a third-party firewall because I want outbound control. And also for other features that the Windows firewall does not give me by default. I'm particularly conscious of making this netbook secure for example, because my connection might be 3G or my own router or someone else's router/LAN that I can't reply on for security ... so the security of the machine itself is paramount.

     

    'Tis very true though - a mis-configured firewall is usually more dangerous than default out-of-the-box settings.

  14. I think this is just as valid an addition to the main cleaner section as any of the other entries. It could go in the Advanced section disabled by default ... like any other setting it could be enabled or otherwise depending on users' tastes.

     

    Edited to add: removed my '+1' ... not because I think it's a idea ... just because on reflection I think it's likely to appeal to such a small minority of users.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.