RejZoR
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by RejZoR
-
-
Defragmentation alone took like 5 times longer. Free space defrag was just as lenghty. And when i checked the drive with GUI version there were still loads of fragments... ugh?
-
Though in the features it wasn't described as win98se compatible, on another site, I saw it was, so I downloaded it, installed it perfectly.
But, whenever I try to run it I get this message (I'll traduce from french):
defraggler.exe is linked to a missing exportation: Kernel32.dll SetFilePointerEx.
Can it work on win98SE, or will it work someday?
I really would like to use it.
Anyway, thank you for bringing us those good and useful software
As far as i understand all NT defragmenters they rely on API only found on NT systems, meaning these will only work on Win2k/XP/Vista/2003...
-
Why on earth is console version so freakin slow while GUI version does the same job in like 1/100th of console version!?
I wanted to setup console version to defragment my system drive on each system boot but on initial test (after already defragmented with Defraggler) it took ages. And here i am now...
If it's a bug, it's a huge one...
any win98SE compatibility?
in Defraggler
Posted
Of course, Vista is load of **** after you tried it for like 5 seconds. No wonder no one likes Vista and they all say its crap. They all tried it for like 5 minutes tops. Yey.