i thought disabling "Strict Blocking" for the site will solve the problem but not
here the solution
1. Expand
2. the setting in this pic disable the blocking for piriform forum only @Green row/column
to disable for all website, you need to disable the blocking on the left column for www.bilder-upload.eu
3. Press the lock icon to make it permenant
on my ff with ublock is nothing to expand...
but if you mean this -->
checked "Striktes Blockieren für diese Seite an-/ausschalten" --> "Strict blocking for this page on / off"
this seems to work thanks for your advice dvdbane
now show me ff the pics in my posts with ublock #6 and #10 in http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=44757
ps: i must correct myself... in this successfull szenario is ublock deactivated, it dont work with activated ublock and "strict blocking for this page is off"
--> uncheck "Verstecke die Platzhalter für blockierte Elemente"
"Hide the placeholder for blocked items"
with this i have at least the pic-link (without this option - on the place of the posted pic is nothing like hazelnut posted)
i mean, i go back to adblock plus until it works "better" ...
on my ff with ublock is nothing to expand...
again, sorry
i forgot that the option to expand will be visible only if you select "Advanced user"
here how
New cosmetic filter to foil specific inline script tags -- one more tool in uBlock Origin's arsenal against bloat. Syntax of this new cosmetic filter is:
example.com##script:contains(...)
Where ... is a plain string or a regular expression. If ... is a string in between / like /.../, the string is treated as a literal javascript regular expression, otherwise it is treated as a plain string.
Caveats of current implementation:
Excellent example of the usefulness of this new cosmetic filter:
Blocking inline script tags for that site would prevent site-defacing ads from appearing, but this is a broad approach which can result in other useful functionality on the site being disabled as well. The new script tag cosmetic filter syntax allows a more refined approach by blocking one or more specific inline script tags on a page. Blocking all inline script is preferred if this does not lead to the site losing useful functionalities. But if this happens, a specific script tag filter is the solution.
Closed as fixed: ChromiumFirefoxCorehello dvdbane this works as in your #21 and #24, thanks again.
unchecked "Striktes Blockieren für diese Seite an-/ausschalten" --> "Strict blocking for this page on / off"
the look-icon is gone after pressing and it works fine and permanent.
the answer from malwaredomainlist...
Hallo,Ich habe mal den ersten Link aus unserer Datenbank überprüft.
Unter www.bilder-upload.eu/thumb/f8abcf-1409116740.jpg findet sich z.B. noch immer Linux-Schadsoftware anstatt eines Bildes. Somit hat der Eintrag in unserer Blocklist seine Berechtigung.
Warum sollten wir bilder-upload.eu von der Liste entfernen, wenn noch immer eine Bedrohung davon ausgeht?
Hello there,I once checked the first link in our data base.
Under www.bilder-upload.eu/thumb/f8abcf-1409116740.jpg be found, for example, still Linux malicious software instead of an image. Thus, the entry has its place in our blocklist.
Why should we bilder-upload.eu remove from the list, if still pose a threat to them?
but ok --> it works with dvdbanes advice
Basically they're stating that because bilder (while seemingly popular amongst European) does not have a good practice of making sure uploads are what they say and that malware domains has in the past and continues to find embedded malware in the images.
You may wish to look into more reputable picture upload sites
Many upload sites contain malware in uploads even those which are popular. Can't imagine why scanning the servers with anti-malware/anti-virus doesn't eliminate the infected files then again maybe they don't scan.
Many upload sites contain malware in uploads even those which are popular. Can't imagine why scanning the servers with anti-malware/anti-virus doesn't eliminate the infected files then again maybe they don't scan.
That's my guess, is that malwaredomains decided that either bilder is, accidentally or purposely, not scanning or uses poor scanning software. And that, when contacted about malware (as I assume is done by a reputable hosts provider), were unresponsive/took no action.
ublock v1.3.1
Closed as fixed: Firefox
I just noticed it now has thunderbird support. wohoo!
ublock v1.3.2
gorhill released this
Oct 28, 2015
[Chromium] question/suggestion: centralized custom filter/whitelist settings? This needs to be tested by an admin, in a proper environment, I can't test this myself. Will wait for feedback.
Closed as fixed: Pale Moon/SeaMonkeyublock v1.3.4
gorhill released this
7 days ago
ublock v1.3.5
gorhill released this
5 days ago
Thanks trium
ublock origin 1.4.0 is out.