Click on the program control tab. Then look at what you have blocked. Allow anything that is from microsoft and you should be good. Or did you try this already?
If there is more to the story like you said please tell us.
I have researched this a lot on the Web and this is what I've found:
Generic Host Process for Win32 Services (svchost, svchost.exe) is such a generic term that it is very difficult to identify conclusively what is trying to access the Internet. Legitimate reasons can be accessing a DNS Server, Remote Procedure Call, and many others. Unfortunately, it can sometimes (apparently rarely) be malware, sometimes possibly masquerading as a legitimate service.
The most common recommendation seems to be to block access, and if you experience no problems with the functioning of your PC or your Internet connection, then leave it blocked. This is what I have done on my PC and I have had no bad effects.
This exact issue really bugs me, and it would be nice if either Microsoft or ZoneAlarm would provide more info as to what is actually happening, such as a more detailed description of what is currently using svchost.exe to generate the warning, and the best way to respond to it. Many people asking about this and the many people attempting to respond to this issue have said the same thing.
Of course running updated malware scans and having real time protection are always a good idea and should (usually) alert you if it is malware causing this problem.
However, if you can supply more info as rridgely requested, he is very knowledgeable and may be able to provide a more helpful response.
Click on the program control tab. Then look at what you have blocked. Allow anything that is from microsoft and you should be good. Or did you try this already?
If there is more to the story like you said please tell us.
Hello rridgely and Mike Rochip,
Many thanks - will follow this up Friday pm and report back to you.
See that's why I hate ZoneAlarm. You can't control the applications very well. Outpost let's you say exact rules.
Yeah thats why TF accidentally blocked needed services without knowing what to do. Is that outpost's fault? no but its confusing. ZA is clearly labled and ones you allow a service its done. Outpost is good but once again its not user friendly.
Yeah thats why TF accidentally blocked needed services without knowing what to do. Is that outpost's fault? no but its confusing. ZA is clearly labled and ones you allow a service its done. Outpost is good but once again its not user friendly.
They have help forums to help you configure advanced rules as well. And Outpost 3.0 and up has an advisor.