I agree with Dennis. Too often your responses are uneccessarly agressive or OTT.
You quoted my reply to Dennis who is not only a friend, he is also a Moderator and does not need your defence.
I am sure he would have advised me if my explanation of my first post was not acceptable.
Or perhaps you thought my first post to Thany was aggressive and OTT - I disagree either way.
I will oppose error with truth and firmness and am sorry that you consider this aggressive.
I will extend to you the courtesy of assuming your criticism is due not to malice but lack of understanding of what I posted to Thany,
so I will explain more carefully for the benefit of yourself and anyone else who misunderstands my meaning and motivation.
I take it as axiomatic that Piriform developers have good intentions and will not wilfully cause confusion and danger.
I therefore trust, (but have never actually tested), that each and every option box denotes some aspect of a computer installation which will ONLY be affected if the box is ticked.
In view of the above it is my firm conviction that when a box is ticked the corresponding item may be affected by running CCleaner,
and conversely if the box is not ticked the corresponding item will not be affected when CCleaner is run.
I am quite certain that there is no box that should be ticked to achieve zero effect when CCleaner is Run.
On that basis I have to assume that "Enable Windows Jump List Tasks" denotes a modification if Ticked, and no modification when NOT ticked,
Thany specifically asked
Does the word "Enable" mean to clean it, or to NOT clean it?
Personally I did not know exactly what the "Enable Windows Jump List Tasks" option meant,
but I attempted to assure Thany that her Start Panel could not be damaged if she unticked that option, regardless of its wording or intention.
Since Thany appeared to think that the wording of this option might affect whether a Tick could change or not change the consequence,
it seemed reasonable to advise in general terms that applied to every tick box item. I do not consider that aggressive or OTT.
If you have further criticisms of my style in 3508 postings I suggest you refrain from hijacking Thany's topic but P.M. me
I do not wish to be part of a controversy that causes a moderator to lock this topic or any other.