Vista Home Basic on 512MB?

Must admit I have been posting a few anti Vista articles so I think it only fair to even things up as I haven't even tried it as yet.

Which is why I had steeled myself for pitiful performance when I yanked all but 512MB out of my test system last week and downgraded to Vista Home Basic. With a 2002?vintage CPU and Microsoft?s minimum recommended RAM, running the most basic of Vista retail editions on a 30GB partition, surely this would be a painful experience.

Or not.

You shouldn?t believe everything you read. I was expecting to need Valium and vodka and an on-call therapist to handle Vista Home Basic on this low-end system. Instead, I found a snappy, responsive OS that did everything I asked of it.

* The system booted two seconds faster than it had with all that extra RAM. On average, Vista?s boot time was less than 30 seconds.

* Menus popped up instantly, with no lag or delay.

* My favorite DVD, Blade Runner, played flawlessly at full resolution, in surround sound. (I had to install a DVD decoder first ? Vista Home Basic doesn?t include DVD playback capabilities out of the box.)

* I was able to rip a CD, check my Google Mail account on Mozilla Thunderbird, and play a full-screen slide show, all at the same time, without a single skip or hiccup.

* Even installing Norton Antivirus 2007 couldn?t slow things down. The Norton software added 7 seconds to my startup time, but after it loaded, everything worked exactly as expected.

ZDnet Article

Vista Ultimate works wonders on mine, 512MB RAM, AMD 3000+.