Oh, I see.
Well, I read that, Hazel. And I read also the part about being hit by java exploits. 2 parts, not 1.
_____
I figured that he was being hit by java exploits because of using insecure IE (possibly), which is why I suggested what I did.
He wanted to know about deleting temp files because of java exploits, etc, so I figured I would kill 2 birds with 1 stone.
Both inform him of whether he can delete 24 hr files, & also, eliminate the cause of needing to delete them (insecure browser, possibly).
_____
You saw where he wanted to delete 24 hr files. I saw where he wanted to delete them because of java exploits. You figured it was only about deleting the files. I figured it was not only about deleting the files, but eliminating the cause of needing to delete them (insecure browser, possibly).
While I am not 100% sure, I just mentioned it because I figured if he was getting hit by java exploits, there was some reason for them, which is why I suggested a more secure web browser just in case he wasn't using it.
_____
I also figured that if the exploit cause were eliminated, the need to delete 24 hr files would go away as well. You can attribute this to our thinking of the same problem in 2 different ways.
You were only interested in the end solution. I was interested not only in the solution, but in preventing the problem in the future so they won't have to be doing this over, and over, and over, and.... You get the idea...
Thanks!