Since I switched to Vista, analyze shows xxMb to be removed, and when Cleaning is done, It shows a lot higher amount has been removed. Say 5-7 Mb more. What is up with that??
There always has been a lot of confusion about MB as normally humans count in 10s but computers count in 16s.Since I switched to Vista, analyze shows xxMb to be removed, and when Cleaning is done, It shows a lot higher amount has been removed. Say 5-7 Mb more. What is up with that??
Hard disk manufacturers rate there in 10s but Windows reports it in 16s so users think they are being ripped off.
Speaking of being ripped off:
What do you think about Vista and its huge hardware requirements and its many reported idiosyncrasies?
What's 5-7 MB on a 200GB hard drive? Maybe as visible as a mosquito on the moon from Earth?
There always has been a lot of confusion about MB as normally humans count in 10s but computers count in 16s.
Hard disk manufacturers rate there in 10s but Windows reports it in 16s so users think they are being ripped off.
Speaking of being ripped off:
What do you think about Vista and its huge hardware requirements and its many reported idiosyncrasies?
What's 5-7 MB on a 200GB hard drive? Maybe as visible as a mosquito on the moon from Earth?
Well, first, that is 5-7Mb of files that it says it removes that it did not show needed removing. That's why the question. Second, Vista's hardware needs are not all that tough. My hardware needs are a lot tougher. Third, I fully understand the difference between base 10 and hex. However, the HDD makers use 10^6 for 1 Mb and the OS reverts to binary and sees it as 2^20. This is where the difference comes in. No offense meant.