redhawk Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 I've check this against the following (and works): Firefox, Opera, Comodo Dragon, Google Chrome, mobile browsers: Bolt and NetFront. Richard S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Nergal Posted February 16, 2011 Author Moderators Share Posted February 16, 2011 Is considering locking this topic if xbrowser>ybrowser talk continues. this should not be a "best browser" converstation if ie9 is faster for one user then it is their choice to use it. If firefox is then use that. come-on; next y'all will start a MAC < Linux > PC arguement. N O T Needed THX ADVICE FOR USING CCleaner'S REGISTRY INTEGRITY SECTION DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF. Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark) ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T. Support at https://support.ccleaner.com/s/?language=en_US Pro users file a PRIORITY SUPPORT via email support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icedrake Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 Hmm, did some more testing out of my own. This is what I think so far: Internet Explorer 9: Huge, huge improvement over previous Internet Explorer versions. I'd say its become a modern browser now, and a viable choice for a web browser. Firefox Beta 11: Nice new interface, the most customisable of all the web browsers as normal. I'd say Internet Explorer 9 is faster than Firefox Beta 11 (at least for me), though the customisability of Firefox is worth using it alone. Latest Chromium/Chrome Canary Builds: Holy cow, they are fast. Fastest thing I've used so far. Scratch that. I should say Opera and Chrome are pretty much equals in speed for me at the moment. Opera: Great as usual. Maxthon: ... Also, I apologise for going off-topic in this topic Nergal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethec Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 @redhawk >> If you take the time to include <!DOCTYPE html> to trigger IE9's Standards mode, it works. Of course, when there's no doctype IE treats the page as some old relic made for IE6, thus triggering Quirks mode. (sorry if I seem angry - I'm just fed up with people posting examples of "something IE can't do" without checking IE renders their code in standards-compliant mode). Anyway, IE9 has full support for CSS3 selectors. :before, :after, :nth-child, etc. are all supported. Piriform French translator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now