New JkDefrag

[BrownSugar]

As long Emro is contributing to these forums, would he be so kind as to inform us if the 0.8 GUI could safely be used with JKdefrag version 3.16?

I see that your upcoming version 0.9 has been upgraded to 3.16, but since it's only a front end for the exe file, would it still be safe to use 3.16 or should we continue to use 3.15?

[JDPower]

As long Emro is contributing to these forums, would he be so kind as to inform us if the 0.8 GUI could safely be used with JKdefrag version 3.16?

I see that your upcoming version 0.9 has been upgraded to 3.16, but since it's only a front end for the exe file, would it still be safe to use 3.16 or should we continue to use 3.15?

Apologies for butting in but should work absolutely fine, there were no feature additions between 3.15 and 3.16 so shouldn't have any effect on the GUI.

[Humpty]

Here is a test I tried in a virtual machine.Slim install of XP pro with no pagefile present.

 

JK is only slightly faster and that's all I have to say atm.

 

Before any defrag.

 

 

After JK defrag.

 

 

After Perfectdisk 7 smart placement defrag.