A 2TB eSATA drive on my computer is shared on my LAN.
Several computers on the LAN use Acronis bkp software backing up to this drive. They back up one-at-a-time, never concurrently. They each create a single backup file of 300 MB to 32 GB.
Although Defraggler's graphic shows ample contiguous free space both before and after the backups, each file ends up fragmented - sometimes in many fragments. How can this be? How can I prevent it?
Just because you have plenty of contiguous freespace doesn't necessarily mean it would get used the way you want it.
Windows isn't particularly smart when it comes to copying files hence the need to occasionally defrag the file system.
As for prevention I doubt this would be possible but defragging freespace should help to minimise fragmentation.
If you use your shared drive for other files you might be better off having a dedicated partition purely for backups.
Richard S.
This drive is being used only for the backups I mentioned. Anyway, the point is that there is ample contiguous free space both before and after these backups. I would expect NO fragmentation at all. But I get a lot of it.
My understanding is that the following algorythm is fundamental to most file systems, including NTFS:
To quote Raxco, makers of PerfectDisk (amongst other things) 'One would think that with multi-gigabyte drives finding contiguous free space would not be a problem. The MicroSoft file allocation algorithm is proprietary, but simple testing demonstrates that extreme file fragmentation can occur even when there is ample contiguous free space on the disk.'
If the disk is only used for backups then fragmentation isn't really a problem, unless you're really tight for space. The additional time taken to read a backup when you need to is insignificant.
To quote Raxco, makers of PerfectDisk (amongst other things) 'One would think that with multi-gigabyte drives finding contiguous free space would not be a problem. The MicroSoft file allocation algorithm is proprietary, but simple testing demonstrates that extreme file fragmentation can occur even when there is ample contiguous free space on the disk.'
If the disk is only used for backups then fragmentation isn't really a problem, unless you're really tight for space. The additional time taken to read a backup when you need to is insignificant.
Thanks, Augeas. That's a good practical view of the issue. I will eventually get lots of fragmentation, but I'll just do a big long defrag maybe quarterly, and not worry over it.