IE10 not checking for new version of pages when pressing back button

Computer Help and Discussions Software
1

I feel like I'm missing some setting or another, but since I upgraded to Windows8 IE has acted different than I would like.

For instance lets say I go to the View New Content button at the top of Piriform's website.

So far so go New content shows

Read the first thread

Go back

Previously By setting The browsing history to check every time a website is visited when I went back the now read item in the list would be gone and I could click the next new item

But now, it still shows it as it was, and I have to either press refresh (F5) or click the View new content button to have the now read go away

:( am I forgetting to check something

post-21882-0-17379500-1351658187_thumb.png

2

What happens if you use Firefox? :P

Try running CCleaner to clear IE10 tracks a time or two.

Then, try each of the options.

Perhaps MS have gotten refresh page reversed with never & the buttons are backwards?

3

This is the intended behaviour of IE10. It stores several previous pages "hot" so that you can navigate back to them without needing to re-load and re-render them. It's designed to make browsing faster and use less bandwidth.

Chrome does it too.

4

@superfast do you use IE10 and Win 8, have you experienced this issue?

@nergal

May be the way IE10 works now.

I know last time I tried IE10 I couldn't sign into Invision Boards using It. It was reported to Invision so it may well be fixed now.

EDIT.. I see WebAtom has posted the reason why.

5

I have a different problem with IE10. On the this forum I cannot press enter to create a new line in text boxes.. Really weird. I googled it and other reported this problem as well.

6

rridgely does using shift+enter work?

7

Nope. :(

8

Nor does ctrl+enter

I just place my replies in plain text (the little light switch)

Superfast, if I wanted to use a different browser, do you NOT think I would be doing that? I'm preeeeeety sure I'm smart enough to figure that one out. Think boy, think. I use ie because if I am to teach computers to luddites, I kinda need to be able to use the browser they use, don't you think.

Is there any way for me to trick IE10 not to do this, it's quite annoying ;)

9

See here for 'answer' which wasn't quite true

http://answers.micro...c1-b6832aaf52ad

Then another one that was :) (but I cannot see answer as I only posted there once and never kept the password !)

http://community.invisionpower.com/resources/bugs.html/_/ip-board/enter-key-does-not-work-when-posting-in-ie10-r38650

10

looks like the fix for the enter key is to upgrade ip.board once again YUCK sigh cc @Hulk

11

I think we all guessed the cause would be forum software :)

12

When I first tried to type here I thought my keyboard was broken.

I hadn't tried to type anything with this PC yet and I couldn't create a new line. Really weird bug.

13

This is the intended behaviour of IE10. It stores several previous pages "hot" so that you can navigate back to them without needing to re-load and re-render them. It's designed to make browsing faster and use less bandwidth.

Chrome does it too.

Isn't this confusing though? If a user selects update from the web (and it doesn't), what is the point of the options being there?

14

Isn't this confusing though? If a user selects update from the web (and it doesn't), what is the point of the options being there?

yes this x100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

15
Isn't this confusing though? If a user selects update from the web (and it doesn't), what is the point of the options being there?

It's a little bit confusing; but once you understand the difference between storing the page "hot" and actually caching the page, it makes sense.

16

The fact that a page might have a static cache of malware that has Active'X controls handed to it on a plate is the hope that keeps a hacker going.

For a page to permit a hot dynamic flow of a malware army playing with Active'X must be a hacker's dream,

17

You know, it's realllllly annoying that when I try and find an answer to this question, and DDG can't find anything, so I search google. And bam at the top there's a link with my exact issue (this is after many hours of searching for a "fix" other than using fiddler debugger)

WOO HOO finally and I don't look where it goes (norton and WOT both say it's safe soooo..

and I find myself right here. . . stupid filterbubble

:censored: