Anti Spyware Comparisons

I would have some form of real-time protection running on your PC, whether that is from your anti-virus or MBAM. I personally recommend users run SpywareGuard or TeaTimer, they are by far the best real-time protection you can get, and free, and far less of a resource hog than using an anti-virus for real-time protection.

Generally you only want one form of real-time protection running on a machine, more than one can cause issues, even if its from an anti-virus and an anti-spyware program. This is one area where more is definitely not better.

Hope that helps a bit

I agree, a HIPS is a great way for more technical people to go.

I would have some form of real-time protection running on your PC, whether that is from your anti-virus or MBAM. I personally recommend users run SpywareGuard or TeaTimer, they are by far the best real-time protection you can get, and free, and far less of a resource hog than using an anti-virus for real-time protection.

I've considered using SpywareGuard, but after reading it's description, it sounds like most of it's features are geared to provide protection for Internet Explorer. Is there any point in using SG if your sole browser is Opera?

I would have some form of real-time protection running on your PC, whether that is from your anti-virus or MBAM. I personally recommend users run SpywareGuard or TeaTimer, they are by far the best real-time protection you can get, and free, and far less of a resource hog than using an anti-virus for real-time protection.

Generally you only want one form of real-time protection running on a machine, more than one can cause issues, even if its from an anti-virus and an anti-spyware program. This is one area where more is definitely not better.

Hope that helps a bit

'Rorschach112' please note: 1.SpywareGuard version was not updated since March 16, 2006

2.TeaTimer`s version was not updated since August 03, 2005 .

Here's why SpywareGuard hasn't been updated:

2. Why is the most recent database update for SpywareGuard dated 2004?

Some of SpywareGuard's strongest protection is its Browser Hijacking Protection, which is a behavior-based defense. It doesn't need any sort of definition updates, and is still as effective (and powerful) as it was on the day of release.

The current real-time protection built into SpywareGuard 2.2, which does use the database updates, has been extended about as much as is possible. This doesn't mean that the current real-time scanning is ineffective - rather that it is limited to detecting most variants of the families of items contained in its last published database.

As for TeaTimer, I think its also behavior based, so it doesn't need to have updates.

These programs don't need updates, reason above

SpywareGuard has nothing to do with what browser you use either

These programs don't need updates, reason above

SpywareGuard has nothing to do with what browser you use either

The detail from javacool does not seem to agree

http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareguard.html

A question or two, if I may. TeaTimer runs heavy relative to other apps, top of the list in the picture, about 123,272 k. SpywareGuard does also, sgmain.exe plus sgbhp.exe, total of 12,712 k. That picture is generated by process explorer from sysinternals.

th_Procexp21.jpg

Process Monitor, also by sysinternals, shows that both apps are very busily monitoring the registry.

The reason for the question is mps69_1999's original post. It is asking sort of "What to keep and what to throw away" if I read it right. These applications don't slow this machine down enough to notice, but they seem to make a noticeable difference on slower computers, owned by relatives and friends.

The frequency of updates issue doesn't seem to matter much for TeaTimer and SpywareGuard (when ya got it right, don't fix it, eh?), although it might for Spybots on demand scanner, right?

In the past, both TeaTimer and SpywareGuard have caught baddies which got past everything else, and locked this system up until I decided what to allow or deny. Made the wrong call on more than one occasion. :P

So the questions are, do they duplicate each others' functions? And, if so, which to lose?

Also, a suggestion, use some sort of virtualization software, Sandboxie, plus Returnil or Powershadow, so that if all else fails and you have to restart, any damage is gone. (so far, fingers crossed)

MikeW

What I was referring to is the fact that SpywareGuard isn't dependent on you using Internet Explorer for it to be effective protection. One of its features is that it has an extra protection layer that works with IE, but it can stop malware no matter what browser you use

Rorschach112: I was always under the impression tea timer would be unneeded for FF users since active x is not allowed. I have never bothered with it since heard SO many bad reports.

can you please give some more info thanks

As far as I know that is not the case. It doesn't matter what browser you use, if you get targeted by malware, the aim of TeaTimer and SpywareGuard is to prevent changes made to the registry. This is not browser dependent.