Why a very small utility from TuneUp, is much speeder than defraggler?
Sorry, I'm Spanish and my English is pathetic :S
---
Edit: Thank's ??
Why a very small utility from TuneUp, is much speeder than defraggler?
Sorry, I'm Spanish and my English is pathetic :S
---
Edit: Thank's ??
The question is of May 28 2009, 03:16 AM
Can somebody answer to me?
Currently I use MyDefrag but I would like to know that I should be defraggler.
Thank's!
The TuneUp program you mentioned looks fine if you want to pay for it, I guess.
CCleaner & a defragmentation program would much of the equivalent functions.
MyDefrag is a great program. I particularly use Defraggler when I want to target only those files which our fragmented.
They are complimentary programs but Defraggler focuses on informing you of the specific files that are fragmented.
Personally I would continue using MyDefrag as your primary defragmenter unless are looking for something else.
Yes, Defraggler+MyDefrag (with optimize option) is great!
Thank's!
Yes, Defraggler+MyDefrag (with optimize option) is great!
Thanks!
You should stick to one defrag program. Often the optimization routines are not exactly the same. Using a second program may therefore undo some of the optimizations that the first program did.
Why a very small utility from TuneUp, is much speeder than defraggler?
Sorry, I'm Spanish and my English is pathetic :S
---
Edit: Thank's ??
Defraggler is quick if you do a quick defrag, but the full defrag does both files & free space.
A lot of "fast" defraggers will perhaps just be doing a "quick" defrag instead of complete.