Furball

Been suspecting for a while now that Defraggler isn't a good defragmentation tool. Today I did a test and compared it with Smart Defrag and my suspicion is true. The picture show Smart Defrag defragmenting C: drive while Defraggler is defragmenting E: drive. Both drives have equal size. Look at the CPU and ram usage. It's night and day! Defragglers takes hours to defrag and uses one CPU core 100% (I have a four core CPU with hyper threading which translates to ~12% is 100% usage of one logical processor). And look at the ram difference! Smart Defrag is super fast compared to Defraggler and doesn't use up as much ram. So there must be at least one bug in Defraggler.

The source code was partially leaked. The source code didn't include everything. I have it and can confirmed this. Would have been better if windows 7's source code was leaked instead.

I want the ability to search for directories instead of filenames.

You should never defrag an SSD. Fragmentation on an SSD doesn't matter since the file access is quick no matter how fragmented the files are. If you fragment an SSD it will only kill the SSD faster. This is why defrag software refuse to defrag SSDs. It's to keep the user from making a bad and costly mistake.