Haven't read the hundreds of posts but must say I'm a bit surprised that we were told it was a PUA/Wrong detection. This implies that Piriform simply wrote it off as bogus without even checking the validity of the warnings from various AV vendors. Thank god I didn't trust it and did not update past version 5.32 on our thousands of client PC's. But this should be a learning curve for Piriform to check detection's validity a bit better. Still liking the product of course. Just raising frustration at how the initial reporting was handled/fobbed off as wrong detection.
