Well, it may be applicable to laptops, although they were comparing a brand-new AMD machine to an Intel machine with hardware that was introduced a year ago already. Ivy Bridge mobile should be better than Sandy Bridge, though from what I've read the AMD APUs are still somewhat better at graphics workloads.
As for desktop processors, I think AMD still has the lead in integrated graphics, but Intel is better at CPU-intensive stuff. Also, a quick look at the AMD web site to compare wattages of various desktop CPUs shows that they don't have any processors with under 80 W TDP except for some older Athlon II and Phenom II models. Intel's Ivy Bridge CPUs have TDPs of 73 W or less by comparison. TDP of course is not always a good indicator of actual power usage, however it gives a rough idea of relative power draw. My new box runs at about 100 watts total.
Oops - didn't mean to include the video in the quote.