Jump to content

xyphur

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

About xyphur

  • Birthday 20/11/1980

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ontario, Canada
  1. Gotcha, thanks for the insight. I figured it may have had something to do with the new card falling outside of Speccy's detection algorithm, or something to that effect anyway. Hopefully I can be of some help to the devs getting it resolved.
  2. I've got a little something to add to this point as well. I noticed today while flipping around in v1.06.191 x64 that some of the specs for my drives were inaccurate or missing entirely. Speccy reports that my two Seagate ST3500320AS drives (500GB, 7200) have 8MB cache, when in reality they both have 32MB. Interface also says "Unknown Interface" when it should say SATA2 (or SATAII, or SATA 3Gbps, take your pick since they're all the same). The temperature is fine though (corroborated by HD Tune Pro 4.50). My third drive, a Western Digital WD2500JS-75NCB3 (250GB, 7200) is being reported as "TB/2.5-inch" under Form Factor, which is incorrect as it's a 3.5-inch drive. Interface says "Unknown" (missing the "Interface" part as the above drives show). The temperature for this one is also correct, again corroborated by the same application as above. Personally, I think the SMART data presentation could be a little more user-friendly. HD Tune provides both the raw data as Speccy does, but also gives you translations in layman's terms along with converting the raw data into units that you can make sense of when you select individual SMART entries. The interface type issue absolutely needs to be addressed though. I can see where this would cause problems/delays as pointed out above for people using it as a means to audit machines in the wild.
  3. Since I'm a new user and this is my first post here, I'll start off by saying hello! Looks like you have a good little community going here and it also appears as if the devs actively participate, which is awesome. Kudos to them and everyone else. So then, about my issue... A fresh copy of Speccy 1.06.191 x64 (portable) isn't showing my newly installed video card (Geforce GTS 450) at all, only my old one (Geforce 9500GT). I was expecting to see both listed so I could get temperatures from them both. For what it's worth, they are not set up in SLI as the 9500GT is a low-profile card without the SLI header - basically I'm using the GTS 450 as my primary card, and the 9500GT is being dedicated to PhysX/CUDA with no monitors attached to it. Is it perhaps because the GTS450 is fairly new-ish (DX11) and Speccy lacks an entry somewhere to identify/interface with it? Would appreciate any insight. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.