Jump to content

CCman

Experienced Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Thank you once again codon for sticking with this and continuing to make good progress, despite the criticisms. I understand you are trying to write in a foreign language which cannot be easy. Just rise above and please continue. You are helping piriform and everyday users of CCleaner, for which I am grateful.
  2. You have quoted the piriform site and not me. This is known as a "straw man" argument. I suggest you read that post again. Here I was agreeing with a moderator on the forum, how you twist this into a claim of trolling is beyond me. I think this is a case of "you protesting too much" (if you understand that term). See below. "I THINK" (very important part of that sentence). Where did I say it was ? Quote me or retract and apologise. The quote was to demonstrate CCleaners claims of privacy, nothing to do with last access date. Please quote where I said "Last Accessed Date" will actually reveal the contents of deleted files or retract and apologise. I see you choose to snipe at me from the sidelines and when you are asked to provide evidence for your accusations you hide away. You have yet to summon the fortitude to reply to post #11. I see you lost the courage to retain your post #20 where you mocked the moderators over zealousness. Ironic you accuse others of trolling, here are a selection of aggressive (trolling) opening lines from YOU to me whilst I have been a member here. None of which you were able to back up when challenged to do so. I have been nothing other than polite here, I challenge you to quote me where I have not been ! You most certainly do, yet again !!
  3. He tells you why he had to do it, he was suffering the same deliberate misinterpretation I am having to endure. He felt more confident having to twist words with the trolls in his own language, poor guy was only trying to help ! I am calm. If you read my posts in a calm way you cannot in all honesty say I am doing anything other than joining in the discussion. I cannot understand why you would make such an unsubstantiated claim, I appreciate your friends with the long term members here but it is not fair to abuse your position. I would be interested to see how you are misinterpreting my posts. Please quote some better examples where your accusation is more clear. You are projecting your own personality and perception onto my posts. Normal users to me is just the everyday joe public, humble users not a computer expert, long term CCleaner expert or moderator etc. It seems as if a few here are deliberately trying to misinterpret things that are said, why is this ? I hope posts are left unedited so we can clearly see the truth. I suspect you will indeed close the thread as reading through it all kind of proves my point. I would however like to be able to reply to Alan_B as he has demonstrated more trolling behavior towards myself than anyone else on this forum. I hope you have the good conduct as a moderator to allow that. It would also be nice to see a bit of impartiality and equal moderation. I suggest you take another read through the entire thread and reprimand those that deserve it. It would also surprise you to read my posts without the unwarranted ill mannered attitude you have attached to them. Perhaps then you might realise I have been trying to help here ! Good grief ....
  4. When wiping an entire drive provide option for random single pass. Zero pass is OK but a random one has some theoretical benefits (on magnetic media). A further benefit of a random pass is for Truecrypt users. Plausible deniability. Make formatting after a drive wipe an option. This again will help Truecrypt users with plausible deniability. It also makes it simpler for the user to see that the entire drive has been overwritten when viewing with a hex editor. Possibility to clean an attached boot drive. To make this request clear, allow the user to boot with their C drive and then attach a drive from another computer (containing an OS) and be able to clean it as it it were the local drive. Obviously there will be some limitations to this. Option to remove Meta data from office files and pictures. Removal from PDF's would also be a nice feature. The ability to remove multiple instances would be very useful, allow a user to select a folder and remove all meta data from the files and folders within. To be honest the meta data removal should be a major priority, many people have little or no idea the amount of information they unwittingly send along with word docs and pictures etc.
  5. Hello Andavari I am very sorry I didn't notice your post until now, thank you for your help and reply. I had managed to work it out but it is good of you to post to show others.
  6. THANK YOU VERY MUCH CODON !!!! Awesome work ! Please do not allow Nergal to deter you from your efforts to help us. He openly admits and seems proud of his demeanor " Interests:being grumpy ". So on behalf of the normal members here who just want to get CCleaner fixed thank you and please continue.
  7. Well spotted Mike ! Thank you for taking the time to report the bug.
  8. Thats quite a serious accusation, please quote your evidence or withdraw your comment. Posting unsubstantiated claims is not conduct expected of a moderator. Again you are misrepresenting, only one of the three quotes is from the business pages. To further compound your misjudgment the CCleaner core is the same on both free and commercial versions, so the quote is relevant.
  9. Oh dear, this is a little confusing. I was quite prepared to believe Nergal when he said... If Nergal's assessment of CCleaner was accurate, then I would have expected other moderators to back his statement especially after I pointed out the inconsistencies with the text on the piriform site. However now it seems as if you are trying to cover over the subject. As Nergal's assessment and piriforms statements are so dissimilar, who are you suggesting the public should believe now ? Nergal or piriform ? As for those asking to provide code. The fact that this privacy omission has been around for about 3 years, at least, tells us something about the incumbent testing team. To expect new members to provide all code for the fixes, immediately is not realistic is it ? Repeatedly asking codon to provide you with code is not fair, he has pointed out the bug and taken the time to explain it very well I think. Have you considered the fact he may not know exactly where all the data resides ?
  10. Found another one... From here.. http://www.piriform.com/business/ccleaner-benefits More... From here.. http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner
  11. Found another one... From here.. http://www.piriform.com/business/ccleaner-benefits
  12. I think we can all agree with your assessment of CCleaner. However I think the following text is misleading users. Taken from here... http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner
  13. There are other missed privacy issues also ... http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=37073&st=0
  14. @radonflex Great first post !! Welcome to the forum. @codon Again great work, its nice to see that someone is fixing this. You have already gone beyond what I was finding. Thank you for your efforts.
  15. @codon Well codon you seem to have everyone "All Shook Up" (Elvis). In my effort to "Stay Clean" (Motorhead) I realise CCleaner is just "Not Enough" (Van Halen). It was good of you to recommend a "Substitute" (The Who) but you were treated like a "Smooth Criminal" (M.Jackson). Perhaps you need to be "Going Underground" (The Jam) when you next recommend a "Fix" (Sisters Of Mercy) you might do better sending a "Message in A Bottle" (The Police) or perhaps a simple PM next time. You could do it "Time After Time" (Cyndi Lauper) but I guess if you do you might get sent to " San Quentin" (Johnny Cash). Thanks for sticking with this problem and helping everyone here. You are a "Hero" (Bonnie Tyler).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.