trium

@ edd -take a look there the protection of an external drive is redundanz of your data - one of your system and one of your external harddisk --> dataprotection of your harddisk is twice redundanz. (actually unneseccary --> normally you do not need System Restore points for an external drive) For my case (private person), think it is enough if you have a system monitoring/system protection only for the master drive (system drive) enabled. --> pic 1 --> c: "on" --> pic 2 --> you can determine the size of which is to protect available on your harddisk. that's just my personal choice!

hi fans , i have found an issue in the current german version: Wipe MFT Free Space --> Freien Speicher im MFT sicher löschen (--> Freien Speicher in der MFT sicher löschen) (thats right but the 1st is shorter)

i have to thank you. may protect you well.

What could possibly be: Do you have the marked locations activated? and already the lightest level "override 1x" with loosely takes twice as much time to complete the cleaning cycle. by default (new clean install) i think its on "activated"

what files do you want to delete? perhaps are this files protected/in access from windows...

have you unchecked both options of monitoring? first above then below?

you must take the option "ausgewählte dateien löschen" --> "delete selected files" i have try it with an example-folder with 37 photos

Oh yes, now I've seen it too. Sorry, I have not used up to now much of this feature. on my test ccleaner is crashed instantly after delete procedure. but my 2 selected files are deleted in one go.

far as I know, the disk analyzer in CCleaner is only to view the Occupancy of the volume there and in what proportion the files occupy the disk. mean you this?

here an free tool: [competing product link removed by moderation] or this little portable tool with drag and drop function: http://www.softwareok.de/?Download=SicherLoeschen there are certainly a number of other tools ...

i think this here check the drive you want

otherwise you dont get your disk space back, how kroozer said. the most recent restore point is calmly anyway http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=43435 http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showtopic=43332 perhaps it helps

i have read in another fred, that you should not interrupt the defragmentation of free space. the GB of data will dissolve afterwards. (I think Defraggler submit those data sets to ...)

thanks the install-error 800F0922 did not get at that time with first version. but now with the new - as yet had indeed installed "old service". after uninstall the old version, restart and install the new version no longer shows this error. (why simple when it can be done cumbersome) the new version does not appear in the task-manager... probably now only when needed even though the service is set to automatic.

i have the name of the nice update: -->kb3022345 it is probably an "advanced error report collection" for w7, w8/w8.1 and w10. maybe more... even though I have installed it, it appeared again in the update list on the optional area.

I dont think he will do that...

here can you read the differences between free and paid version https://www.piriform.com/recuva/version-history

this is to assume. i simply uncheck the offer and its ok. later if its available i download the slimversion (without reinstall) and delete the standard-version.exe

sorry, i was too hasty chromixium there is yet in german http://chromixium-os.de.uptodown.com/ubuntu

shame on me its not for me to work with them

i have found another... with ff 37.0.2 with ie 11

in principle i give you right. (yes -its clear that the remaining time only a estimate/guide point is...not an exact prognosis) but on all other systems i have to try it (2x xp pro, 1x xp home, 1x xp home by a friend, 1x vista bus by me + 1x vista bus by a friend, 1x 7 pro by me + 1x 7 home premium by a friend --> all 32 bit versions) does the estimate of remaining time works fine and complete defrag of windows-main-partition (c:\) works fairly quickly. the desktop-pcs from my friend are fast and art of the state (6 core more than 2,5 ghz per core, sata, with hdd and ssd + enough ram) and my desktops are with obsolete hardware (1 core with less than 1,6 ghz, ide-hdd and max 1,5 gbyte ram) my practice/experience shows me that defraggler seemingly have a problem with estimate of remaining time (on perhaps only on my laptop) with w8.1 64bit ... it goes on with >1 day ... than fairly quickly (on this size of used memory on hdd) down to maybe 30 min with 50-60 % defragmented and then the estimate goes high progressively to maybe 2 hours (4 fold) but only 1 % more of defragmented space about 20 min real-time. but after this difficult chunk´s defraggler goes back to the "old" estimate remaining time (please look at pic 1 and pic 6) and this estimate time corresponds in about with real-time. thats why i put it in the subforum "defraggler bugs" because i have only seen it on w8.1 64 bit laptop and not on any of the 32 bit desktop systems. is this possibly a thing between 64 and 32 bit or a thing between w8.1 and older windows-versions or so? (thats of course just my personal impression after the experiences + screenshots) i hope i do not go on your biscuit too much so... (its a german slang)

I again tried it on two desktop PCs ... they are running normal with remaining time just only on the laptop comes this phenomenon

i would be glad too