Jump to content

Chris Lowe

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chris Lowe

  1. Thanks MrRon! So is the CPU low while Defraggler is running on your test machine? If you need any more system info or if there's any way I can help out, then please feel free to give me a shout on the personal email I used to register this account. Cheers, Chris.
  2. Hello, This is running very slowly for me too: Defraggler version 1.14.159; My laptop has a Core 2 T8300, RAID 0 hard disks, Vista Ultimate 32bit SP2. When running Defraggler is sitting near 50% CPU, practically occupying an entire core, which seems odd for what I imagined to be an I/O bound process (is there any polling going on?). I used Process Explorer to get a thread stack and these two appear quite frequently: ntkrnlpa.exe!KeWaitForMultipleObjects+0xabc ntkrnlpa.exe!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x492 ntkrnlpa.exe!KeTestAlertThread+0x78 hal.dll!KfRaiseIrql+0xd1 hal.dll!KeRaiseIrqlToSynchLevel+0x70 hal.dll!HalEndSystemInterrupt+0x73 hal.dll!HalInitializeProcessor+0xcc1 Defraggler.exe+0x20e29 Defraggler.exe+0xf1a02 Defraggler.exe+0x10a848 ntdll.dll!RtlEnumerateGenericTableWithoutSplaying+0x424 ntdll.dll!RtlEnumerateGenericTableWithoutSplaying+0x4a ntkrnlpa.exe!KeWaitForMultipleObjects+0xabc hal.dll!KfLowerIrql+0x64 ntkrnlpa.exe!ExReleaseResourceLite+0x161 ntkrnlpa.exe!KeSetEvent+0xb2a ntdll.dll!KiFastSystemCallRet Defraggler.exe+0xfcd49 SHELL32.dll!Ordinal264+0x3f1 SHELL32.dll!Ordinal236+0x4f2 iastor.sys+0x76f75 SHELL32.dll!Ordinal205+0x3a53 Defraggler.exe+0x120055 Like others here, defrag time is many hours. If this performance issue gets fixed then this will be a fantastic tool. Cheers, Chris.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.