I love Defraggler. Ever since I discovered the secret of defragmenting and defragmenting my free space, my Vista has never been faster.
So, I tried installing it on my sister's PC (an XP) and my mother's laptop (also an XP). This is where the clash began.
In my Vista, I can perform both tasks ["Defrag Freespace (allow fragmentation)" first, "Defrag Checked" last) and, when I would redo it again, they would both report that the disk was optimized according to both standards (free space AND continuous, 1-piece data).
But, in XP, it seems that the two standards clash and contradict. I would do one process, when I did the other, it would just undo what was done my the first process... and vise versa.
Is this just with their machines? Or is this universal for all (or at least most) XP's? Is there a way defragmenting with both standards met?
Thank you for your time.
Take care,
RedStarYellowSun